A person's mere propinquity to others independently suspected of criminal activity does not give rise to probable cause to search that person.
Abortion is inherently different from other medical procedures because no other procedure involves the purposeful termination of a potential life.
At the very least, the freedom that Congress is empowered to secure includes the freedom to buy whatever a white man can buy, the right to live wherever a white man can live. If Congress cannot say that being a freeman means at least this much, then the 13th Amendment made a promise it cannot keep.
Censorship reflects a society's lack of confidence in itself.
Censorship reflects a society's lack of confidence in itself. It is a hallmark of an authoritarian regime.
Ethics is knowing the difference between what you have a right to do and what is right to do.
Fairness is what justice really is.
For me this is not something that can be swept under the rug and forgotten in the interest of forced Sunday togetherness.
I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material but I know it when I see it.
In fact, a fundamental interdependence exists between the personal right to liberty and the personal right in property.
In fact, a fundamental interdependence exists between the personal right to liberty and the personal right to property.
It must always be remembered that what the Constitution forbids is not all searches and seizures, but unreasonable searches and seizures.
Swift justice demands more than just swiftness.
The 4th Amendment and the personal rights it secures have a long history. At the very core stands the right of a man to retreat into his own home and there be free from unreasonable governmental intrusion.
The Court today holds the Congress may say that some of the poor are too poor even to go bankrupt. I cannot agree.
The dichotomy between personal liberties and property rights is a false one. Property does not have rights. People have rights.
These death sentences are cruel and unusual in the same way that being struck by lightning is cruel and unusual.
To force a lawyer on a defendant can only lead him to believe that the law contrives against him.
We are concerned here only with the imposition of capital punishment for the crime of murder, and when a life has been taken deliberately by the offender, we cannot say that the punishment is invariably disproportionate to the crime. It is an extreme sanction suitable to the most extreme of crimes.
You can share a link to this page with your friend!