A lot of the stories are internal. They leak it to me wanting to get attention, wanting to get that headline. More times than not, I will not give it to them.
All truths begin as hearsay, as far as I'm concerned.
Because I have success, it doesn't mean I'm part of the mainstream. I'm still an outsider.
I cover media people the way they cover politicians.
I didn't go to the right schools, didn't come from a well-known family, nor was I even remotely connected to a powerful publishing dynasty.
I do most of my business on that dirty Internet that you were just talking about, where I find there is a lot of freedom to report exactly what I want.
I don't necessarily think anything on a Web site can have a result.
I envision a future where there'll be 300 million reporters, where anyone from anywhere can report for any reason. It's freedom of participation absolutely realized.
I follow my conscience - and this is upsetting to some people, but I maintain the conscience is going to be the only thing between us and communication in the future.
I never think too far into the future. I'm too busy thinking about tomorrow's news.
I want one place I can go that is not going to be lewd, and I'm not sure there is anything left.
I was first to break the news about the death of Lady Diana. The CNN team couldn't get into makeup fast enough.
I'm not mean.
I've written thousands of stories, started hundreds of news cycles.
If technology has finally caught up with individual liberty, why would anyone who loves freedom want to rethink that?
If the first lady is concerned about this Internet cycle, what would she have done during the heyday when there was 12, 13 editions of a paper in one day? What would she have done with that news cycle?
It seems to me we are losing our way in an effort to get the ratings.
Meet them once and you're innocent; meet them twice and you're not. So if you see me having drinks again with Harvey Weinstein then, okay, you've got me.
Not everything I do is gossip or bedroom. To the contrary, I think that's just an easy label to dismiss me and to dismiss the new medium.
Some of the best news stories start in gossip. Monica Lewinsky certainly was gossip in the beginning. I had heard it months before I printed it.
Television saved the movies. The Internet is going to save the news business.
The first step in good reporting is good snooping.
The Internet feeds off the main press, and the main press feeds off the Internet. They're working in tandem.
The media is comparable to government-probably passes government in raw power.
There won't be editors in the future with the Internet world, with citizen reporting. That doesn't scare me.
There's a danger of the Internet just becoming loud, ugly and boring with a thousand voices screaming for attention.
There's nothing more exciting than to watch a story break and grow, and to be the first one to present it to the world.
We have entered an era vibrating with the din of small voices. Every citizen can be a reporter, can take on the powers that be.
With a modem, anyone can follow the world and report on the world-no middle man, no big brother. I guess this changes everything.
You would be amazed what the ordinary guy knows.
I go to bars. I go to straight bars, I go to gay bars.
In the end, it's just me sitting in my house with a computer and a keyboard. I don't think about the millions of people who may be reading. It feels like a very solitary activity." Interview with Camille Paglia, February, 2003
Hosts his own radio talk show.
Parents divorced when he was six.
Has been frequently described as being a "loner" when he was growing up.
Gets over two and a half million hits a day on his Drudge Report web page.
Was sued by Clinton presidential aide Sydney Blumenthal for 30 million dollars in libel damages after Drudge wrote - and retracted - a report which wrongly accused Blumenthal of spousal abuse. The case was settled out of court, and Blumenthal agreed to pay $2500 in expenses to Drudge.
Famous for breaking the Monica Lewinsky-Bill Clinton sex scandal story.
Internet news journalist.
Has only a high-school education, where he was an underachiever. He ranked 341st out of 355 in the Class of '84. Ironically, he received a D in his "Current Events" class.
You can share a link to this page with your friend!